|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Web posted
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) -
Of the two Alaska investigations into abuse-of-power allegations
against Sarah Palin, the governor has chosen to cooperate with just
one: The one that guarantees secrecy, can last for years and which she
could conceivably dismiss. The Alaska Legislature in
August began its inquiry into whether Palin abused her office when she
fired Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan, which he claims happened
when he didn't fire a state trooper whom Palin's sister had divorced. Palin
initially pledged cooperation with that probe, which was unanimously
approved by eight Republicans and four Democrats, saying, "Hold me
accountable." After she became Sen. John McCain's running mate on Aug.
29, she backed off, claiming that those behind the probe were biased
and manipulating the report's outcome and timing. Around
the time she was announced on the McCain ticket, she filed a complaint
against herself with the Alaska State Personnel Board, the body that
investigates ethics complaints against executive branch employees. Her
attorney asked the Anchorage prosecutor hired by the Legislature to
step aside in favor of the personnel board investigation. Palin,
through the McCain campaign, says the personnel board has jurisdiction
over the matter and that she won't cooperate with the legislative
probe. The campaign accuses the Democratic lawmaker overseeing the
investigation, state Sen. Hollis French, of planning to use the
investigation as an "October surprise" before Election Day. Palin's
husband and nearly a dozen state workers either subpoenaed or asked to
testify before lawmakers have refused to do so. Palin's
preferred probe — the one she filed with the state personnel board — is
nonpartisan and will be fair, McCain spokeswoman Meg Stapleton said
Tuesday. The campaign is now working to schedule interviews with the
investigator for Sarah and Todd Palin, she said. But
that investigation, unlike the more public legislative one, would
require the investigation to be conducted in complete confidentiality.
Under Alaska law, those who are part of such an investigation are
unable to acknowledge even its existence until the personnel board
decides there's enough evidence to hold a hearing. If the complaint is dismissed, the probe and all the information related to it remains confidential. Palin
can waive confidentiality. The McCain campaign — which is fielding all
questions about Troopergate on the Palins' behalf — on Tuesday said the
governor originally did so, but then the independent investigator,
Anchorage attorney Timothy Petumenos, requested she not speak publicly. McCain spokesman Ed O'Callaghan later acknowledged that the state's confidentiality laws still apply. Alaska
law also allows a personnel board investigation to last for up to two
years. It's unknown how long Petumenos will need, but given the lengthy
process involved, it seems unlikely to be completed by Election Day. The
Legislature's investigator, Stephen Branchflower, plans to submit a
report on Troopergate by Oct. 10, with or without the subpoenaed
witnesses' testimony, French has said. Also, Palin may
be able to have the complaint dismissed simply by refusing to
cooperate. State law says that if the person who filed a complaint is
unwilling to assist in the investigation, that can justify the probe's
termination. O'Callaghan said he did not know whether
that interpretation of the law was correct, but Palin intended to
cooperate fully with the personnel board investigation. An e-mail request for comment to the three members of the state personnel board was not answered on Tuesday. |
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
AlaskaJournal.com | AlaskaStar.com | AlaskanEquipmentTrader.com
Copyright © 2007-2008 Alaska Journal of Commerce & Morris Communications Inc |
|||||