Bush foresees 'a lot of selling' to open ANWR to oil drilling
WASHINGTON -- To win the centerpiece of his energy plan, President Bush will have to change some minds among seven Republican senators who staunchly oppose oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
That’s in addition to penetrating an almost solid wall of Democratic opposition, plus counteracting intense lobbying from environmentalists who have made protection of the refuge their top priority, people on both sides of the issue agree.
"We’ve got a lot of selling to do," the president acknowledged recently.
Bush, a former oilman, has made drilling in ANWR the focus of his campaign to boost domestic energy production, arguing that drilling and wildlife preservation can go hand in hand.
But some members of the president’s own party have made clear their distaste for exploitation of the refuge.
Republican Sen. Bob Smith of New Hampshire is among the lawmakers bracing for a high-powered pitch from the White House. He says he won’t be swayed.
"I’m trying to change their minds," he said in an interview.
A Republican energy bill, scheduled for introduction this month in the Senate, will include, as its core proposal, development of the refuge’s 1.5 million acre coastal plain. Geologists believe as much as 11 billion barrels of crude oil may be beneath the surface there.
Democrats already have indicated they’re prepared to filibuster, if necessary, on any legislation that includes the refuge issue.
"It’s kryptonite and will kill the energy bill," predicts Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore.
Congress set aside ANWR’s coastal plain for protection 41 years ago. Oil companies have been lobbying to gain access to the tundra starting about 60 miles east of the Prudhoe Bay oilfields ever since. Environmentalists view it as a national treasure not to be disturbed, citing the annual migration of caribou and numerous species of birds to the area along the Beaufort Sea.
While Bush’s victory in November gave new impetus to lifting the congressional ban, Senate elections the same day made it more difficult.
Six Republicans and one Democrat who favored development of the refuge either lost their bids for re-election or retired. Two of them -- Attorney General John Ashcroft and Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham -- are now part of the Bush Cabinet. All seven were replaced by Democrats opposed to drilling.
On the other hand, all but one of the eight anti-drilling Republicans are back, showing little sign of shifting sides. Along with Smith, they are Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, James Jeffords of Vermont, Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, Peter Fitzgerald of Illinois and Richard Lugar of Indiana.
The lone GOP drilling opponent who lost -- Delaware’s William Roth -- was defeated by a Democrat with the same stance. Only in Nevada and Virginia did the pro-drilling forces make gains with the election of two GOP senators -- John Ensign and George Allen -- who are likely to be in their camp.
Three Democratic senators have made clear their support for developing the refuge: Daniel Inouye and Daniel Akaka, both of Hawaii, and John Breaux of Louisiana.
Last year, pro-drilling forces won a narrow 51-49 symbolic vote on drilling in the refuge as part of a budget bill. With the changes produced by last November’s election, that vote now would be 54-46 against drilling.
Public attitudes, according to various surveys, indicate voters prefer that the Alaska refuge be protected. A recent poll by The Associated Press showed 53 percent of those responding were against oil drilling there, while 33 favored development.
"I don’t think the case has been made," said Collins, the Maine senator, in an interview. "We need to look at other ways to increase production and conserve more energy and develop alternative energy sources."
Sen. Frank Murkowski, R-Alaska, who will guide energy legislation through the Senate and for years has been a staunch advocate for drilling in the refuge, says he thinks he can win some anti-drilling senators to his side.